Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 7 , Pages 490-494, July 2010

On the More Insidious Manifestations of Bias in Scientific Reporting

  • R. James Brenner, MD, JD

      Affiliations

    • Bay Imaging Consultants, Carol Ann Read Breast Health Center, Oakland, California
    • University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: R. James Brenner, MD, JD, Bay Imaging Consultants, Carol Ann Read Breast Health Center, 3100 Summit Street, Oakland, CA 94609

Although bias in scientific reporting has been the focus of prior commentary, more insidious aspects of such bias often excape attention by authors, reviewers, editorial boards, and commentators. Such bias is no longer simply academic because health care policy, which is increasingly predicated upon evidence-based scientific literature, may be adversely impacted by lack of balanced and objective publications in peer reviewed journals.

Key Words: Peer review, bias, scientific reporting, editorial

 

PII: S1546-1440(10)00077-3

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.007

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 7 , Pages 490-494, July 2010