Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 9 , Pages 698-704, September 2010

Long Radiology Workdays Reduce Detection and Accommodation Accuracy

  • Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author and reprints: Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD, University of Arizona, Department of Radiology, 1609 N Warren, Building 211, Room 112, Tucson, AZ 85724
  • ,
  • Kevin S. Berbaum, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • Robert T. Caldwell, MFA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • Kevin M. Schartz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • John Kim, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Purpose

The aim of this study was to measure the diagnostic accuracy of fracture detection, visual accommodation, reading time, and subjective ratings of fatigue and visual strain before and after a day of clinical reading.

Methods

Forty attending radiologists and radiology residents viewed 60 deidentified, HIPAA-compliant bone examinations, half with fractures, once before any clinical reading (early) and once after a day of clinical reading (late). Reading time was recorded. Visual accommodation (the ability to maintain focus) was measured before and after each reading session. Subjective ratings of symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain were collected. The study was approved by local institutional review boards.

Results

Diagnostic accuracy was reduced significantly after a day of clinical reading, with average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.885 for early reading and 0.852 for late reading (P < .05). After a day of image interpretation, visual accommodation was no more variable, though error in visual accommodation was greater (P < .01), and subjective ratings of fatigue were higher.

Conclusions

After a day of clinical reading, radiologists have reduced ability to focus, increased symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain, and reduced ability to detect fractures. Radiologists need to be aware of the effects of fatigue on diagnostic accuracy and take steps to mitigate these effects.

Key Words: Reader fatigue, observer performance, visual accommodation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by grant R01 EB004987 from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (Bethesda, Md).

PII: S1546-1440(10)00134-1

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.004

Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume 7, Issue 9 , Pages 698-704, September 2010